March 9, 2017
The End Of Medbox
Faithful readers will surely recall my earlier posting about the marijuana vending machine by Medbox. Now it seems it was all a stock scam. They settled with the SEC for $12 million. Now the litigants are in line for their take.
February 6, 2017
Carjacked 1,200 Pounds Of Marijuana
In Pomona! They were caught when they were spotted from the police helicopter unloading the weed in the "700 block of Washington." So I went to Google maps to look at the aerial view to see if possibly there were other indications.
Planning Commission - January 31, 2017
This was a special meeting of the Planning Commission to deal with the heavy marijuana workload. There are currently only four Planning Commissioners. Those two statements aren't directly connected. It's city staff that has a heavy marijuana workload and, coincidentally, there are only four commissioners for now.
Basement Cultivation at Green Leaf Wellness
This item was the agenda for the January 10 Planning Commission meeting, but was continued because the owner of the dispensary didn't show up. Now, on January 31, the owner was present.
Commissioner De La Torre asked if the cultivation area in the basement extended under any neighboring business, such as the nail salon. City staff said it did not. Aw, too bad, because when I first saw these plans I could tell that it would extend under the nail salon. When the owner came to the podium he explained that the basement did, in fact, go under the nail spa. The point of that question was to determine whether an additional fire alarm should be installed in the nail salon, in case of a fire in the basement. The owner went on to list security measures he was putting in place, such as hardening the exit doors and installing card readers so he can track every employee who goes into a cultivation room.
Commissioner Cirner asked about ADA compliance. The plans show only two ways to access the basement and both of them are stairways. Rather than answer that question, the owner described more security measures he was putting in place. Mr. Cirner seemed to accept that as an answer. At the end of the meeting I asked Community Development Director Rangel about ADA requirements. His answer was, basically, that full ADA access in this space would be cost prohibitive. Yes, of course, but I didn't know you could compromise on ADA improvements solely because of their cost.
Someone (I could neither see nor hear who) moved to approve with the addition of an alarm in the nail salon connected to the fire detection system in the basement, Mr. Cirner seconded. Approved 4-0.
Tentative Parcel Map by DHS Properties, LLC
This is an empty 14.9 acre lot on Little Morongo Road north of Two Bunch Palms Trail. This tentative parcel map is for condominium purposes for marijuana cultivation. The agenda packet showed the applicant to be DHS Properties, LLC, but staff said the applicant was David Snyder.
The CUP for this parcel was approved in November 2015.
With no discussion or public comments, Commissioner Romero moved for approval, Mr. Cirner seconded, approved 4-0.
Four Parcels on Cabot Road
These four parcels are all adjacent and all will be used for cultivation. But there are two owners and some differences between each parcel, so this item includes FOUR CUPs, two development agreements and one mitigated negative declaration. (No partridges.) The two owners are Cabot Building Partners and DHS Therapeutics. It's on the east side of Cabot Road, a couple of empty lots south of Two Bunch Palms Trail. 6.29 empty acres.
Commissioner Cirner moved for approval with the addition of two lights on poles, seconded by Commissioner De La Torre, approved 4-0.
The entire meeting wrapped up in only 35 minutes.
January 11, 2017
Planning Commission January 10, 2017 - Cultivation, Cultivation, Cultivation, Cultivation
Commissioner Terifaj is no longer with the Planning Commission. Here's the form to fill out if you want to be part of shaping the future of DHS. Mayor Pro Tem Joe McKee is the one to make the appointment to fill this seat. Present tonight were Andrew Cirner, Scott De la Torre, Dirk Voss (Chair) and Cathy Romero.
The agenda this night consisted of four public hearings:
- A marijuana cultivator's tentative parcel map
- A CUP for a marijuana cultivation facility
- Amending a CUP to allow for marijuana cultivation in a dispensary
- Subdivision of land to be used for marijuana cultivation
Tentative Parcel Map for We Care DHS
The CUP for this grow facility got final approval back in August. The location is vacant land on Two Bunch Palms just west of the only cultivation site that is currently operational.
Conditional Use Permit and Development Agreement for A Green Culture DHS, Inc.
This location is the northeast corner of 15th Avenue and Little Morongo Road. 15th Avenue is just a dirt road there.
The building will have 22,479 square feet of cultivation area and greenhouse roofs, so their electric bill will be a bit lower. The design of the building includes two 9 x 12 feet rollup doors that the cultivators don't need, but the city has started adding requirements to the cultivators' CUPs that will make the building more likely to be useful for other purposes when the day comes that they decide not to cultivate there anymore.
CUP Amendment for Greenleaf Wellness
All marijuana dispensaries are permitted to grow up to 99 plants in Desert Hot Springs. When the CUP for Greenleaf Wellness was approved, however, the dispensary did not include any plans for the 1,315 s.f. basement. Now, they've got plans and they've come back for this amendment. The owner, Thom Miller was not present at the hearing.
Ted Mayerhofen commented that he had worked on this building before it was a dispensary. He thought there were security issues. He also said that delivery would have to be from the alley, and an ordinary truck would block that alley. OTOH, any delivery to any business in that little shopping center on the southwest corner of Buena Vista and Palm Drive could block an alley. Plus, I thought the main reason for alleys was using them to load and unload, because then the trucks are not blocking the main streets or taking up parking lot space. So what if it blocks a short alley for a short time? Later, the discussion of the Commission indicated that they understood a dispensary would have no large deliveries or shipments, so no big trucks would be in that alley anyway.
Commissioner Cirner raised the question of ADA access to the basement. In the floor plan above you can see there is a stairway coming down from the first floor and one door that exits to the exterior. It looks to me like that's the door that opens onto the stairway that goes up to Palm Drive. That would mean this basement space is not 100% beneath the dispensary, as it seems to extend to the eastmost end of the building.
The stairway from the one exterior door is on the left side of the building.
This would certainly not seem to be ADA compliant. Do small business have to conform to ADA when doing major renovations? I think they do. Installing an elevator in this building would, it seems to me, be very cost prohibitive. This cultivation space may never come to be.
The vote was 2-2, making it a denial. Commissioners Cirner and De la Torre voted against. Mr. Cirner had brought up the ADA issue, but Mr. De la Torre never expressed his concerns about the project. Then a motion was made to continue the hearing to next month's hearing (February 14) so some of their questions could get answered and to give the owner the opportunity to show up and explain. That motion was approved 4-0.
Coachillin Holdings Tentative Parcel Map
Before discussion started on this one Charles Rangel introduced himself as the new Interim Community Development Director.
Coachillin Holdings propose to build the biggest cultivation site in the city on Indian Canyon between 18th and 19th. You may have already noticed that there has been some grading there. The land is vacant, but the Google satellite view below is recent enough to show some of the grading.
The site is 150 acres and the developer proposes to subdivide it into 40 parcels. Mr. Rangel said that staff recommended this item be continued...again. This is not the first time this has come before the Commission and been continued. Part of the reason this time is that the developer handed a new map to the city on the very day of this meeting. That map would need to be reviewed by both the planning department and fire department before the staff could make any recommendation on that.
Another, bigger reason for the continuance is that the property has on it what the Army Corps of Engineers calls a blue-line stream. Here's the definition of blue-line stream as given by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District:
Blue Line Stream - Any stream shown as a solid or broken blue line on 7.5 Minute Series quadrangle maps prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior Geological Survey (USGS). A blue line stream may be any creek, stream or other flowing water feature, perennial or ephemeral, indicated on USGS quadrangle maps, with the exception of man-made watercourses. The United States Army Corps of Engineers uses USGS blue line stream markings as a preliminary indicator of “Waters of the United States”. Streams identified on USGS maps in such a manner are therefore generally subject to federal environmental regulations.
A USGS map of the site. That's I-10 at the bottom. Dillon Road runs across the top of the map. It shows that "blue-line stream" coming down from the north, crossing Dillon and then Indian, then parallelling Indian as it crosses Coachillin's property. You can make it out in a regular Google satellite view, but it's also been used by off roaders, which somewhat obscures it. Before they can do anything on that site they need a sign off from the Army Corps of Engineers which will state, in effect, that they don't expect to be sending any ships up that stream, nor do they plan to dam it for hydropower or irrigation. BUT, the guy who does that at the Army Corps of Engineers retired in November and it seems he has not been replaced. Kenny Dickerson who represented Coachillin Holdings at this meeting, suggested that if both he and Interim Community Development Director Rangel went together to the Army Corps, they would get some action.
Coachillin Holdings disagrees with the requirement to put sidewalks on the streets around the project (except along Indian Canyon - there will be a sidewalk there). They also object to sidewalks inside their property. Their reasoning is that sidewalks make it easier for nefarious people to get closer to their valuable product. What a lot of nonsense. If your security plans are overwhelmed by simply providing evil doers a level path to walk on, then your security plans need a lot of beefing up. Every dispensary, every cultivator, everybody actually, puts in sidewalks. Never have I heard an argument that sidewalks attract crime. That sort of non-logic is usually used when a city is planning to extend a subway line or bike path, because everyone knows most stolen TVs are transported by either bicycle or mass transit. Crooks never have cars.
Coachillin is paying to build the roads around its facility. The sidewalks are a only a small part of that. Why would the city want to force people to walk in the street in an industrial zone?
Mr. Dickerson said that he would redo his proposal so that it only dealt with the parcels to the rear, which the blue-line stream doesn't cross. Mr. Rangel said that wouldn't help, because the Army Corps of Engineers would also have to sign off on a decision that the blue-line stream doesn't cross those parcels.
These are the remaining issues that still must be resolved before the Planning Commission can make a decision. Rather than bringing this proposal back month after month simply to approve a continuance, the Planning Commission voted to table it, meaning it hasn't been rejected and it isn't scheduled for a decision. Whenever Coachillin can get all their ducks in a row, they'll come back to the Commission.
Special Meeting, Tuesday, January 31
Mr. Rangel said there is a bit of a backlog of proposed cultivation facilities that are ready for the Commission, so the Commission agreed to a special meeting on the 31st to review some of those.
December 6, 2016
Happiness, I Think
November 13, 2016
Blythe Outlawed Marijuana Sales
But that was some time ago when the issue was solely medical marijuana. Now, however, the city leaders see that Blythe could be THE city to supply recreational marijuana to all of Arizona...illegally, of course, but how many cops can Arizona tie up just to watch for marijuana to cross the Colorado River.
November 4, 2016
DHS Dispensary #6
The city's sixth medical marijuana dispensary is open, and this is the one that's only one block from where I live! Great for the day I'm in a wheelchair. They give their web address as IVTHC.com, but it looks like they let their domain registration slip, because there's nothing there now. They are on the west side of Palm Drive almost at 4th Street, 11555 Palm, immediately next to the dentist's office, in that set back building that used to be a dentist's office.
Here's their Weedmaps page. They opened only yesterday, November 3. Hours are 10 AM to 7 PM, every day of the week.
It's the building on the left.
October 2, 2016
DHS in Palm Springs Life
Palm Springs Life has a good and accurate article covering all the aspects of marijuana cultivation coming to Desert Hot Springs.
September 29, 2016
Canndescent Ribbon Cutting
Canndescent is the first cannabis cultivator to go into real operation in Desert Hot Springs, which means it's the first legal cultivation site in California, outside of dispensaries themselves. Boy Scout Troop 1606 brought the American flag and led the Pledge of Allegiance, which the cannabis people thought was a bit unusual. But! One of the Scouts is trying to raise money for a trip to Washington DC for some Boy Scout function. Canndescent covered his remaining financial need with a check for $3,300. I would like to be there when he tells other Scouts how he raised his money.
"Transforming Agriculture." I imagine in a few years as the cannabis industry settles down we'll get used to seeing slogans like you'd see in Iowa or any other predominantly agricultural state.
Canndescent also presented the city with its first tax payment of $135,000. The tax rate is based solely on cubic footage of the grow area, so the city doesn't have to wait for a crop to mature and be sold to get taxes. I don't recall if the taxes are paid quarterly or every 6 months, and no one said if this tax payment is one full payment, or does it cover through the end of the calendar year or perhaps the fiscal year? Nevertheless, $135,000 is almost the cost of one cop for one year. So it's a start.
Their armored vehicle which doesn't seem to use CNG.
An historical plaque that Canndescent will erect. I suppose this fulfills their "art in public places" requirement. The plaque says:
This marks the site of the first municipally-permitted cannabis cultivator operating in California. On November 5, 1996, California became the first U.S. state to legalize medical cannabis use. On October 21, 2014, Desert Hot Springs became the first city in California to legalize cannabis cultivation. On September 19, 2016, CANNDESCDENT commenced production.
Video of the grow room so you can see all the fans and appreciate the resulting noise.
September 25, 2016
Joint Meeting Of The City Council & Planning Commission, September 13, 2016
This was a special joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission solely to consider an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.180 "Medical Marijuana Facilities Location." The proposed amendment clarifies and expands the current law. The current law did not address manufacturing (making edibles, packaging product, extraction, etc.). The amendment would put manufacturing in the industrial zones along with cultivation. The amendment also included restrictions on extraction methods. Some extraction methods use flammable solvents.
Testing and distribution facilities are addressed in the amendment, too, and they will be restricted to the industrial zones. The definition of "delivery" is also in the amendment. The existing ordinance is silent about delivery which, I think, made it illegal. Does merely defining it in a zoning ordinance make it legal, in the absence of any sort of restriction? Maybe it does.
Attorney Jennifer Mizrahi first covered some corrections to be made to the proposed amendment. After that, Mayor Pro Tem Joe McKee said that section 17.180.060(d) Operational Requirements needed to be culled because as written it would be too burdensome. Here's my summary of the 12 paragraphs that make up that section:
- "Manufacturers are limited to certain equipment, methods, solvents, gases and mediums when creating medical marijuana extracts."
- "Medical Manufacturing Facilities with a state license of a Type-6 (non-volatile) or a Type 7 (volatile) classification may be allowed to operate under this Chapter."
- All of the usual laws regarding air, water, health and safety apply. The usual permits are required.
- Class I and Class II solvents (as defined by the FDA) are forbidden.
- But "butanes, ethanol, carbon dioxide, propane, heptane or other solvents exhibiting low to minimal potential human health-related toxicity for extraction, or other methods approved by the State" are okay. Any solvent must be at least 99% pure.
- Extraction using hydrocarbons must conform with the standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and with proper ventilation.
- If CO2 is used for extraction, that also must conform to ASME standards. And there has to be proper ventilation.
- If any other method of extraction is used, there must be proper ventilation and ignition source controls.
- "The amount of residual solvent per gram of finished extract cannot exceed 300 parts per million when quality assurance tested."
- An exact duplicate of 3 above.
- "Manufacturers may use heat, screens, presses, steam distillation, ice water, and other methods of extraction without employing solvents or gases to create kief, hashish, bubble hash, or vegetable oils or fats derived from natural sources, and other extracts."
- "Manufacturers using extract to create ingestible products shall only use food-grade ingredients."
Attorney Mizrahi said that in a discussion earlier that day with Mr. McKee he had expressed his desire to get rid of 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12; leaving the "less stringent" requirements.
Council Member Anayeli Zavala said she thought it was important to retain the level of detail in the paragraphs that Mr. McKee wanted to eliminate.
Ms. Zavala also spoke about another provision in the proposed amendment. That provision is 17.180.060(e) which requires marijuana manufacturing facilities to hire a Ph.D chemist to "supervise the design, installation and operation of the facility’s systems and manufacturing processes." She asked if the intent was for the chemist to be there only during setup, or is the chemist supposed to supervise on an ongoing basis.
Council Member Russell Betts said he didn't see anything in the proposed amendment that gives the city the ability to shut down a non-confirming business. The attorney assured him that provision was in there. [There's only one thing on the agenda, this proposed amendment, and it's only 10 pages long, but that's still too much for Betts]. The relevant bit is at 17.180.120(d): "Failure to abide by any laws mentioned in this subsection shall constitute a public nuisance and shall subject the medical marijuana facility to revocation of any and all entitlements, licenses and permits." Then again in 17.180.130(b) which begins "A conditional use permit approved for a Medical marijuana Facility may be suspended or revoked for any violation of this Chapter..."
Mr. Betts went on to ask if a testing lab could be safely located in a commercial zone. The amendment is written to restrict them to industrial zones, but his concern is that industrial land has become so expensive here that a lab might benefit from being able to open in a less expensive commercial zone.
Planning Commissioner Dirk Voss said he was ready to approve the amendment now.
Commissioner Paula Terifaj said she thought that labs should be permitted in commercial zones.
When Mayor Matas opened the public hearing, the first speaker was Jeff Ridge. He said that he thought the 99-plant limit for dispensaries should be changed so that cultivation in dispensaries is restricted in some other way, such as square footage or wattage used. He said the 99-mature-plant limit made it very difficult for dispensaries to operate. He also suggested delivery services should be required to have city or county permits from any city or county that bans delivery service before the service can deliver there. The intent would be to keep delivery services from going into cities where they are banned.
Bob Sellen spoke next. He was there representing a new group called DHS Can. He said they think it's good to have laws in place until the new state laws go into effect. He said there is no independent third party testing lab for marijuana.
Gretta Carter spoke in favor of the amendment, saying that until the state regulations come into place, city regulations like this protect the marijuana industry.
Dan Osborne with Clonetics Laboratories said the testing will keep the medicine safe for patients.
Brent Furman expressed support for the amendment. He said Ph.D. chemists are usually brought in after the "crude" oil has been extracted to oversee the refining process.
Andrew Milks supports the amendment. He said he would like to see the 99-plant cap removed. The coming California regulations restrict it by square footage, not by number of plants. The smallest state license will be 5000 square feet. He asked for a matching municipal limit.
Back when the original medical marijuana ordinance was debated and approved, the issue of whether the limit should be by square footage or number of plants was discussed quite a bit. I thought square footage would be a lot simpler to administer, but others said counting plants was easier. Representatives from the marijuana industry commented then that the 99-plant limit was fine and they could certainly work with that. Somehow it is now unusable! Five-thousand square feet is more square footage than any dispensary in town, and I mean the entire dispensary, not just the grow room. Organic Solutions of the Desert, the large dispensary on Ramon in Palm Springs is something closer to 5,000 square feet. Maybe it's a coincidence that Organic Solutions of the Desert is also the stinkiest of the dispensaries in the Coachella Valley.
Michael Dixon said he was concerned at the lack of a reference to the most recent state legislation, SB 837. He has found several inconsistencies between that legislation and the proposed amendment. He said the most qualified people in the marijuana industry are not Ph.D. chemists, but those who have had the most innovation in extraction. The proposed amendment's only quality standards concern potency and residual solvents. More than that needs to be tested. He also said there needs to be consideration of the fact that the amendment's definition of "manufacturer" is so broad it includes the simple re-packaging and labeling of products that goes on at a dispensary.
Nicole Salisbury recommended there be a neutral third party tester, rather than having each cultivator hire their own chemist. She also said that testing labs should be permitted in commercial zones. She expressed dissatisfaction with the 99-plant limit, saying it is too small.
Katy Podine said that the ordinance could be re-amended at any time, so there is no real risk in fast-tracking this amendment. She said that the definition of "manufacturer" was taken directly from state law.
Planning Commission Chair Cathy Romero said the discussions so far all focused on safety and quality and warned against the possibility of over-regulating. She said that if a business in Desert Hot Springs wanted to extract the oils of a lavender plant or frankincense or sandalwood, she doubted that the city would be so concerned with quality and safety.
Commissioner Voss pointed out that the provision in the amendment for a Ph.D. chemist already defines the position as neutral and third-party. Here is that paragraph people have been talking about:
As a condition of obtaining a City-issued medical marijuana regulatory permit and conditional use permit, a licensee of a manufacturing facility desiring to operate under this ordinance shall first verify that the licensee employs or contracts with a person who has a PhD in chemical sciences who shall supervise the design, installation and operation of the facility's systems and manufacturing processes. The licensee shall submit to the City a written statement that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury that the name of the employee/contractor is true and correct. The employee/contractor shall also submit a written statement that he or she certifies under penalty of perjury his or her educational qualifications and verifying that the supervisor is employed full-time to supervise the design, installation and operation of the facility's systems and manufacturing processes.
IMO, since the paragraph permits the chemist to be either an employee or an independent contractor, I have to disagree with Mr. Voss. He cited the fact that the paragraph requires certification. But the only verifications actually required are certifications of the chemist's name, qualifications and that he is employed full time.
Commissioner Andrew Cirner also warned against the risk of over-regulating.
Commissioner Terifaj expressed concern that the city might be approving something that would be in conflict with state law in 2018. The attorney pointed out section 17.180.060(f) [it's identified as "(e)" in the agenda packet due to a typo, but this comes right after the requirement for a chemist] which says state regulations take precedence over city regulations..
State Regulations. In the event the State of California implements health and safety regulations applicable to Medical marijuana Manufacturing Facilities, upon implementation of such state regulations, all Medical marijuana Manufacturing Facilities operators shall immediately implement the state regulations. Should there be a conflict between the provisions of this Chapter and the state regulations, the state regulations shall control.
Ms. Terifaj suggested that the city go ahead and approve the zoning component of this amendment, while forbidding extraction until the state regulations are in place.
Commissioner Voss moved for approval of the amendment, with all of the corrections that the attorney listed. In 17.180.060(e) the reference to full-time employment (for the chemist) would be removed. In item 17.180.060(d) all items would be deleted except for 1, 2, 8 and 10. Here those are for your reference:
1. Manufacturers are limited to certain equipment, methods, solvents, gases and mediums when creating medical marijuana extracts.
2. Medical Manufacturing Facilities with a state license of a Type-6 (non-volatile) or a Type 7 (volatile) classification may be allowed to operate under this Chapter.
8. All other methods of extraction shall be conducted in an environment appropriate to the solvent being used, with consideration to proper ventilation and ignition source controls.
10. All equipment, systems and manufacturing processes must meet or exceed all applicable state and federal requirements and regulations regarding air, water, health and safety, and handling, processing and storage of hazardous materials, solvents, gases and waste. No manufacturing facility shall commence operations or be issued any form of certificate of occupancy without first obtaining all required fire, environmental, health and safety, planning, and building certificates, permits and approvals required under City’s Municipal Code and all other applicable county, state and federal regulations
The motion did not change the zoning rule that restricts manufacturing to the industrial zone. Commissioner Cirner seconded the motion. Chair Romero asked Commissioner Voss why his motion did not address the 99-plant limit. He said he feels okay with what we have in place.
The motion was approved 5-0.
Then attention went back to the City Council as they discussed the revised amendment approved by the Planning Commission.
Mayor Matas said he had received information about the dispensaries' problems with the 99-plant limit only the evening before, so he has not had time to fully inform himself on the subject. He said he will organize a subcommittee (himself and Mayor Pro Tem McKee) to meet with the dispensary owners and make sure their voices are heard.
Mr. McKee said that at a later date the council needs to address delivery modifications, the 99-plant limit, and labs in commercial zones.
Ms. Zavala moved to approve with the additional requirement that the Ph.D. chemist is required to visit the facility quarterly. Council Member Yvonne Parks seconded. Approved 4-1 with Mayor Pro Tem McKee voting against.
September 8, 2016
Israel To Export Marijuana
Israel has removed the limits on the number of marijuana cultivation sites in the country. They plan to begin exporting it in two years. The article says nothing about which countries might permit it to be imported.
July 23, 2016
Santa Ana Marijuana Raiders Fired
June 8, 2016
Marijuana Cultivation Groundbreaking
This took place on Little Morongo, between Two Bunch Palms and Pierson.
All these t-shirts bore the number 1411, but I don't know the significance of that.
May 19, 2016
Illegal Cultivation Site Discovered
You want to know what stupid is? Here's stupid:
Back in January the City Council approved the Bunch Palms Trail cultivation facility that would be new construction at the corner of Cabot and Two Bunch Palms Trail. It is one of the few cultivation sites that plans to use greenhouses. The owner (or one of the owners maybe) John Van Beek, without putting a shovel in the ground, went down the block and started cultivating at Francisco's Auto Repair on Little Morongo Road completely without ANY permits.
IOW, the guy with complete legal entitlements to cultivate decides to forego that and open an illegal cultivation site in one of the very few cities in California to permit legal cultivation. It's double-stupid. He gets it for the illegal grow, and he ain't gonna make much progress on his legal site after this.
April 21, 2016
The Desert Hot Springs Marijuana Meeting
Everything you missed at last night's meeting. For the most part, a very interesting couple of hours. That is I, in the red t-shirt on the left of the screen as the video starts.
"I am a very conservative individual. I have totally done a 180 on my opinion" regarding marijuana, said [Desert Hot Springs Mayor Scott] Matas, who describes himself as a right-of-center registered Republican.
April 13, 2016
Three Cultivations Sites And One Dispensary Approved
I listened to last night's meeting of the Planning Commission from my private personal health facility, where I can exercise my right shoulder and hack up my left lung without disturbing the general public. Got to keep track of which marijuana facility is going where.
Last night the commission approved three more cultivation sites and one more dispensary.
Desert's Finest Patient's Cooperative
The dispensary (Lawrence Bynum - Desert's Finest Patient's Cooperative) is going to occupy the long-former location of Thai Palms on the northeast corner of Palm and Acoma. FINALLY, something to fill that blank in a prominent corner location. This is certainly going to be the most visible dispensary right here in the city. The site, which the dispensary will be renting, is connected also to the empty lot just east across the alley. There will be parking in that lot and quite a bit of discussion was about how MUCH of it would be used. There also was a general lamentation about the planning standards of the 1940s and '50s in this town. Yup. That's our legacy.
The site will have no more than one green cross displayed, and that will be painted on the south-facing Acoma side of the building. There will be potted plants along Acoma as well, including a few palm trees.
You can see on this interior plan that the dispenary's space includes the area behind the barber shop next door. More than half of the space can be used for cultivation. This is, as far as I can recall, a larger space than at other dispensaries in town, but all the dispensaries are limited to 99 mature plants.
After the approval, there was some discussion about a billboard on Palm that can be seen as you are coming into the city that is promoting a low price at some dispensary. I don't recall seeing that sign, but there did used to be a sign that you could see as you headed south on Palm Drive that advertised "Home of the $5 Gram," but that was for PSA Organica, which is one of the newer dispensaries in Palm Springs. The city attorney explained to the commission what the city was able to control and NOT able to control in public advertising. At least one commissioner thought advertising like that could sully the image of the city as "Dime bag DHS. While it did look like the low class sort of advertising you can find in Los Angeles, I think some price competition between dispensaries could be beneficial to the patients.
The first cultivation site on the agenda last night was by Ryan Po of DHS Diversified located at 65441 Two Bunch Palms Trail. That building has been used as a recycling center up to now.
One thing I have not heard is where are the tenants of these industrial buildings that are being snapped up for marijuana cultivation, relocating to? The Pentecostal church surely has enough money from its sale to relocate into a residential area of the city, but the industrial businesses must be leaving town. There are no spare buildings in our industrial zone now, and anyone who tried to buy a site to put up a new building would be competing with the marijuana industry. I hope all these cultivation sites become fully developed and employ as many people has they have been saying they will.
An advantage to going into an existing building, is that electric service is already there. Mr. Po said he has 400 amps, which was plenty.
Kamran Amirianfar for Blue Mango was there last night for two different sites, each requiring a separate CUP. The Planning Commission handled them separately. The first will be at 65118 San Jacinto Lane; the second at 65265 San Jacinto Lane.
The interior of 65118 is divided into 18 separate units which have been rented out to industrial tenants. The interior will be redone to create space for four large cultivation rooms and five smaller rooms for curing, processing, shipping, etc. Chair Romero encouraged them to removed the ficus and palm trees that decorate the street frontage, to be replaced with more drought tolerant plants.
65265 San Jacinto Lane will not require nearly as much work to re-arrange the interior. They'll keep most of the existing interior partitions and have two large, interconnected, double-deck growing rooms. The interior features a mezzanine from which, I imagine, one could gaze across the big spread of green leafy plants, as any farmer likes to do. They will also be cultivating up on the mezzanine.
Both sites were approved unanimously.
The single non-marijuana item the Planning Commission considered was a request to be permitted to erect vinyl fencing on top of existing "retaining walls" between new homes in the Gallery Vista Santa Fe homes at the northern end of Sonora Drive. The agenda packet describes them as "retaining walls," but it seems unlikely there would be an actual retaining wall between each house, unless they were built on a fairly steep hillside. Nevertheless, the fencing was proposed only between the newest homes (which I think are Coachella Valley Housing Coalition sweat equity homes). There would be no vinyl fencing facing the street.
The Planning Commission rejected the request.
March 26, 2016
I just want to emphasize that this is March of 2016, because we've found an actual Sheriff in Missouri who had never heard of using butane to make an extract from marijuana. And they even put it in candy!
He's a Sheriff in LaClede County, right in the heart of southern Missouri.
Here's another video of the sheriff in which he claims highs from marijuana edibles lasts for two to three days! He also considers the presence of Gummi bears and butane in the same vehicle, to be reasonable cause.
The trouble with calling marijuana oil "marijuana honey" is that there is real marijuana honey; i.e. regular ol' bee honey with regular ol' green marijuana bits infused in it.
March 13, 2016
DHS Planning Commission - March 8, 2016
Dispensaries approved: 3
Total dispensaries approved: 12
Dispensaries open: 5
Dispensaries denied: 1 (technically a continuation, but it's going to be denied)
Cultivation facilities approved: 1
Dirk Voss presiding at first, as Chair Cathy Romero was late, but Ms. Romero arrived before the Commission had even approved the agenda.
City Manager Magaña and Financial Director Tanner spoke at length about the budget and taxes. After years of underspending and cutbacks, whaddayaknow, there's a lot of critical stuff that's going to start failing. Like staff, even. And some taxes are going to expire. [My editorial: meanwhile the City Council (well, three of 'em) have voted not to even study new or revised taxes.] But I'll spare you the really bad news.
As with last month's report, just the marijuana:
Benno Pabst and Valley Compassionate Care
This is a proposed CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary at 11522 Palm Drive, which is the southeast corner of 4th and Palm, the old chiropractor's office which is 1,207 square feet. Parking for 6 vehicles is proposed to be on the south side of the building (where there may also be a mural) with access via the alley. Four head-in parking spaces on 4th will be eliminated.
Commissioner Cirner recused himself due to a possible conflict of interest.
Benno Pabst was not present this night for health reasons, but his representative was there and spoke. Pabst owns the building outright.
There was a lot of discussion about the parking. Staff had first laid it out with diagonal parking so that patients would drive in from the alley and exit on Palm Drive. The Commission thought it would seem more sensible to drivers coming up Palm Drive to reversed that. Now, the thing I wonder about is left turns from southbound traffic. That entrance on Palm Drive is only 25 feet away from 4th Street.
Yes, there will be two dispensaries directly across the street from each, so there will be no need to run across Palm Drive at night wearing dark clothes, right? And that ought to solve the problem of left turns too.
Lisa Lozano and Stephanie Bodde and Desert Hot Springs Dispensary
Another proposed CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary. This one was continued from last month. You may recall that potential neighbor Rose Mortuary raised objections about inadequate parking. There were other issues as well.
Chair Romero said that she could see all of the issues she had with this CUP had been addressed.
Thomas Moen, manager of Rose Mortuary, said he was concerned a dispensary could conflict with his business. Parking only in the street is still an issue.
Michelle and Michael Lally both expressed their support for medical marijuana generally, and spoke well of Stephanie Bodde. Mr. Lally also criticized Rose Mortuary, saying they both serve the same community, one in life and one in death.
David Lally (son of Michelle and Michael, if you hadn't guessed) talked about the tax benefits to the city. He described the personal experience with medical marijuana by a friend.
Jordan Bratonburg, owner of Rose Mortuary, also shared a personal experience in his family. He was concerned that some of his clientele would be offended by the proximity of the dispensary.
The applicant said that her security guard would not let her clients park in the Rose Mortuary parking lot.
Vice Chair Voss said that he, too, was concerned about the parking situation, especially the lack of a designated handicapped parking space. He also wanted to clarify what will happen with the small house in the rear of the property. He said this is the wrong location for a dispensary.
Commissioner De La Torre said he agreed with Mr. Voss.
Commissioner Terifaj said these were all the same issues brought up last month and that she, too, thought it was a poor location for the dispensary.
Rich Malacoff asked the Commissioners to specify which findings in the prepared CUP the Commission would determine had not been met. Then staff would use that information to craft a legal resolution of denial and bring it back next month. Staff prepared only the positive resolution of approval for the agenda packet, not wasting time on a negative just in case.
Ms. Terifaj cited the parking issue as the reason to deny.
The applicant came back to the podium to say that an elderly gentleman lives in the house in the rear and that he is a member of her collective. She does not want to kick him out so that she can tear down the house for parking. She was not aware of any problems with parking until this meeting. (It did come up as an issue the previous month, though.)
The Chair reopened the public hearing at the suggestion of the city attorney.
The applicant said she had an informal parking survey done at the Brown Dog dispensary which is east of Palm on Pierson. Over the course of a week there was only one time during the day when there were three cars there and the overlap was for only two minutes. In the evenings there would sometimes be as many as three cars there. She expects the same traffic at her dispensary. Street parking would handle that small amount.
Vice Chair Voss moved to continue this until next month at which time staff will have prepared the proper denial paperwork. Approved 5-0.
Eduardo Rivera and D.H.S. Alternative Healing Corporation
How about another CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary? This one is also continued from last month (and the month before that, IIRC). The continuance was to allow a neighbor to come in and comment on this. No changes have been made from last month. This one is going to be at 66328 Pierson Boulevard.
Unfortunately, the aggrieved neighbor did not show up. There were no public comments at all.
Vice Chair Voss moved to approve with the additional requirement that there be no neon lighting. Approved 5-0.
Dino Sogoyan - Desert Hot Springs, Collective, Ltd.
This item is a CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary to be located at 66292 Pierson Boulevard. That's just to the east of Wiefels Mortuary.
The monument sign in front of the building will have to be upgraded to meet current sign standards. The applicant is buying the property and said he plans to tear down that monument sign.
Commissioner Cirner moved to approve with the additional requirement that they come up with a different color scheme (and no neon). Approved 5-0.
Adrian Sedlin - Canndescent, MBC
This is for a CUP for a marijuana cultivation facility at 65334 Two Bunch Palms Trail, which is currently occupied by an auto repair business and tire recycling business. The two buildings are about 4,800 square feet each.
The applicant says he hopes to be operating by June 15.
Vice Chair Voss moved to approve with the addition of a ban on neon signs. Approved 5-0.
The Planning Commission also approved a design review and development permit for a warehouse and retail facility for Angel View on Dillon Road.
They also appointed Andrew Cirner to the Arts District Committee.
March 2, 2016
Planning Commission February 9, 2016 - just the marijuana
- Total Dispensary CUPs considered: 5
- Continued: 2
- Approved: 3
A late report on only the marijuana aspects of last month's Planning Commission meeting based on the city recording...which means I can't hear what they're saying when a microphone is turned off.
Cathy Romero was chosen to be the new Chair, and Dirk Voss the new Vice Chair. Dirk Voss was absent from the meeting.
Ian Armstrong from Palm Springs got up to comment on the state of the medical marijuana market. IMHO, the only experts on the MMJ market are those people who are in it: such as dispensary owners and cultivators; and even they don't have perfect knowledge of this newly legal, rapidly expanding, still somewhat shadowy business. Nevertheless, Mr. Armstrong presented himself as an expert. His research seems to have been little more than looking at Weedmaps.com, which is very unreliable, if for no other reason than that the businesses listed can pay to be promoted on the site. He claimed that only two dispensaries in Palm Springs are operating in the black (i.e., profitably). He didn't say how he knew that. He says the others are expecting to make a profit only after recreational legalization. He said the valley is quickly becoming saturated with medical marijuana facilities, both dispensaries and cultivators. [Note: the only legal cultivation actually underway in the valley right now is the cultivation going on at the dispensaries, which is a fairly small time thing.] He "explained" that the difference between a dispensary and a cultivation is that cultivation reduces consumer prices while dispensary operations destroy multiple dispensaries and "prohibit businesses from actually being engaged properly." That's not how I would define either operation, but Mr. Armstrong was getting to his point.
He said the items on this night's agenda looked "severely problematical" because of the "saturation of medical cannabis facilities in Coachella Valley." You see how he switched from saying it's quickly becoming saturated to saying here that it is saturated. See how quickly that was?
But, heavens no, Mr. Armstrong is not opposed to opening any dispensaries. "After watching Colorado," it is Mr. Armstrong's opinion that any new dispensary must take business from others. IOW, Mr. Armstrong claims to know the maximum amount of demand for medical marijuana, even though this country has never had an experience with MJ like we are having now. He says Coachella Valley has less than 150,000 people - and he admits he came up with that number by adding the population of DHS with the population of Palm Springs. Period. Other areas of Coachella Valley have either no people or no people who want medical marijuana, I guess. "General rule of thumb for a successful medical cannabis facility: one dispensary per 20,000 people," he said
Let's take Riverside County. The population is 2,293,000 (2013) so that works out to a need for 114 dispensaries, if we use that dubious figure of one dispensary for every 20,000. The only legal dispensaries in Riverside County are in Palm Springs and Desert Hot Springs, where there are a total of 10 legally operating MMJ dispensaries. Using Mr. Armstrong's calculation, we still need 104 dispensaries just to satisfy our county's residents. But one might also add in San Bernardino and Imperial Counties, since they have no legal dispensaries. Medical marijuana patients in those two counties must travel to Los Angeles, San Diego or the Coachella Valley to find a legal dispensary. Add in 2,088,000 for San Bernardino County and 176,584 for Imperial and we've got a 3-county population of 4,557,584 or a need for 226 dispensaries, putting us 217 dispensaries shy of his theoretical saturation point.
More modestly, the nominal population of the incorporated areas of Coachella Valley in 2013 was 361,124. Even without adding in the population of the unincorporated areas or trying to calculate what effect the tourists could have on demand for MMJ, that number divided by 20,000 is 18, so we need at least 9 more operating dispensaries, if Mr. Armstrong is correct.
Mr. Armstrong went on to say that with the market over-saturated, businesses will fail, making it difficult for patients to get their medicine. Why would an over-saturated market collapse into a market of short supply? Wouldn't the number of dispensaries shrink to the point where they are all profitable. If it's difficult for patients to get medicine, that's untapped demand, which would signal the need for additional dispensaries. He said the severe competition would INCREASE prices! I don't know what business school Mr. Armstrong attended, but increased competition tends to lower prices.
He asked the Commission to delay new approvals while the Commission conducts an independent evaluation of the cannabis industry in Coachella Valley. This is something outside the purview of the Planning Commission. They are not required (and probably not permitted) to take into account the expected profitability of a proposed business. One assumes the entrepreneur who is risking his money has taken care of that. Mr. Armstrong (not unsurprisingly) offered to assist in conducting that evaluation. Mr. Armstrong, then, is a part of that small niche of the cannabis industry: self-appointed experts who will explain the complex cannabis industry to overwhelmed city leaders. Uh-huh. He said that when more dispensaries open in the valley (Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Indio are the cities he listed, although I'm sure Indio and Rancho Mirage have bans on dispensaries), all the dispensaries in Desert Hot Springs will be eradicated. He did not offer an explanation as to why all DHS medical marijuana patients would seem to prefer to shop in other cities, according to his prediction.
Benno Pabst and Valley Compassionate Care
This would be for a CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary on the southEAST corner of Palm Drive and Fourth Street. That would be this former Chiropractic office:
The applicant had requested a continuance to the March meeting. The Commission approved that 4-0, Vice Chair Dirk Voss being absent.
Eduardo Rivera and D.H.S. Alternative Healing Corporation
This was for a CUP for a medical marijuana dispensary at 66328 Pierson Boulevard. That's this building and the dirt lot to its east, although the applicant now wants that dirt lot excluded from the proposal, as doing so will eliminate some requirements for landscaping and curb repair:
This one came to the Planning Commission in January, but needed a lot of work before it could be approved. Most dispensary applicants have met all the minimum requirements and are offering extras above that by the time they get to the Planning Commission. Not this one, though. Specifically, it needed a paving and landscape plan, removal of wheel stops, removal of all chain link fence, removal of the front fence and gate, a photometric plan, painting exterior conduit to match the building exterior.
A member of the public, Joseph Miner, had submitted written comments that were critical of granting this CUP. Planning Commissioners discussed whether the hearing should be continued. The applicant had brought his attorney along. The attorney addressed the commission.
One member of the public, name sounded like Bruce Newell, not a resident of DHS, got up to comment on this matter. He expressed a general opposition to marijuana that I won't summarize, except to point out one statistic he delivered. He cited the "American Medical Board." I haven't been able to find an organization with that exact name, although it's part of the name of a lot of organizations. But the AMB says that 17% of kids who try marijuana under the age of 24 will develop mental illness. Is it pure coincidence that 17% figure is very close to the 18.2% rate of mental illness in the general American population?.
Commissioner Cirner moved to continue. Approved 4-0.
Umberto Bagnara, Southern Cal Medical Marijuana Patient Association
This is going to be the second dispensary in the Mission Lakes Marketplace, 64949 Mission Lakes at Little Morongo Road. The applicant stated that his lease at that shopping center includes a provision that there will not be more than two dispensaries there.
Commissioner Terifaj said she had invited Ian Armstrong to this meeting. She said he represents the American Cannabis Chamber of Commerce. I wrote about that when I first heard Mr. Armstrong speak at December 8, 2015, Planning Commission meeting.
Chair Romero moved to approve as written. Seconded by Andrew Cirner. Commissioner De La Torre wanted to amend it to ban the use of neon signs in the windows, but that amendment was not included. [The other dispensary there already has a neon Open sign.] Commissioner Terifaj expressed her concern that too many dispensaries were being approved and some would end up going out of business. Approved 4-0.
Jason Foster and CV Wellness
This is for a CUP for a dispensary at 11555 Palm Drive. The two buildings on the southwest corner of Palm and 4th which were both dentist offices at different times; the one set back from the street, second door south of 4th, is 11555 Palm Drive. The lot has parking for seven vehicles. Like Sungrow, this dispensary plans to have separate entrance and exit doors for greater security.
Commissioner Terifaj moved to approve as presented, but after being questioned by the attorney, she amended her motion so that it neon signs would not be permitted anywhere on this site. But then upon further questioning she revised that so that neon signs were banned only from the windows. But, I point out, only neon is neon. The commission probably intended to ban all lighted signs from the windows, but they banned only neon. LED signs are much less expensive and just as effective and flashy. Approved 4-0.
Lisa Lozano and Stephanie Bodde and Desert Hot Springs Dispensary
This is for a CUP for a dispensary at 66406 Pierson Boulevard. That's the little building immediately to the east of Haidet's Hardware.
There is no parking on site, other than the single handicap parking spot. Ms. Terifaj, concerned for the lack of parking, said the front building was not built for commercial use. There is a small house at the back of the property that someone is living in.
The owner of Rose Mortuary next door to this site objected to the odors that would emanate from the dispensary.
Thomas Moen, funeral director at Rose Mortuary, expressed his opposition to the dispensary. He said the driveway is not paved. Also, the mortuary business is very sensitive, he said. He pointed out that the Rose Mortuary is one of extremely few businesses in DHS that draws business from across the Coachella Valley and the high desert.
Another owner of Rose Mortuary expressed his objections as well. He was mostly concerned with the lack of parking, while the two neighboring businesses do have parking lots. He thinks dispensary customers will park in Rose Mortuary's parking lot.
The applicant for the CUP said that her security guard would be out front making sure no one parked illegally. She had reached out to Rose Mortuary, but they had not responded until this meeting. She said there will be more odor coming out of the mortuary's crematory stack than out of her dispensary. She went on to say that she will be operating as a non-profit. Currently she provides medicine to women who are with Rosie's Place at her own expense. She said the retail sales at the dispensary will support her charitable work. Commissioner Terifaj asked her why she needed a location on a busy thoroughfare like Pierson when she already has a clientele, many of whom do not live in DHS.
I might remind Ms. Terifaj that the dispensaries are limited to the commercial zone. If we've got a commercial zone that is NOT on a busy thoroughfare, then it's probably zoned wrong.
The applicant said she thinks she's got a perfect location. She said that the city requires the applicant to have secured a location before they can begin the application process. There was a scramble for buildings and there weren't a lot of choices. She said she had reached out to Rose Mortuary because she thinks they serve much the same population and she hoped to establish some cooperation, but Rose Mortuary never responded to her until they walked into this meeting.
An owner of Rose Mortuary came to the podium again to point out the city's requirement for parking at commercial facilities, which is one space for every 250 square feet. This location doesn't have anything close to that minimum. The owner of the building said that the city code applies to new construction only. His building is grandfathered in.
Rich Malacoff said that there is no grandfathering on the parking rules in this case. This is a CUP process, so the Planning Commission can establish the parking requirements.
Community Development Director Nathan Bouvet suggested the Planning Commission continue this item because it seems there are several items to be resolved: width of the driveway, parking, architectural amenities, site width.
Commissioner Cirner was concerned that handicap access may not be adequate.
Commissioner Terifaj moved to continue and to make a field trip to the site, by which she meant individual trips, not a special meeting of the Commission. Approved 4-0.
February 26, 2016
DARE Drops "Gateway Drug" Label For Marijuana
Even DARE found it had to face reality, at least a little bit. Now they list the only two gateway drugs I know of: alcohol and tobacco.